dc.contributor.author | Cerci, Mehmet Halis | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Ali Kerim | |
dc.contributor.author | Kehribar, Lokman | |
dc.contributor.author | Surucu, Serkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Aydin, Mahmud | |
dc.contributor.author | Mahirogullari, Mahir | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-28T11:37:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-28T11:37:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Cerci, M. H., Yilmaz, A. K., Kehribar, L., Surucu, S., Aydin, M., & Mahirogullari, M. (2023). Evaluation of Isokinetic Knee Strengths after ACL Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Four-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw Fixation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(12), 4004. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12294/3916 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial fixation have comparable results in muscle strength and knee function to those undergoing ACL reconstruction with four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw fixation. Materials and Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, 64 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon were included. Patients underwent ACL reconstruction technique with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial button fixation in Group 1, and patients underwent ACL reconstruction with coupled four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw in Group 2. Evaluation of patients was performed with the Lysholm and Tegner activity scale preoperatively and at the 1st and 6th months postoperatively. At the 6-month visit, isokinetic testing of the operated and non-operated limbs was performed in both groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the age, weight, and BMI values of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). According to the strength values of the operated sides of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2, there was no significant difference in the angular velocities of 60 & DEG; s(-1), 180 & DEG; s(-1,) and 240 & DEG; s(-1) in both extension and flexion phases between the operated sides of Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients who have ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial fixation have comparable muscle strength and knee function to those who undergo ACL reconstruction with four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jcm12124004 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | ACL reconstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | cortical suspensory fixation | en_US |
dc.subject | interference screw | en_US |
dc.subject | isokinetic strength | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of Isokinetic Knee Strengths after ACL Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Four-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw Fixation | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.department | Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-4083-3619 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Cerci, Mehmet Halis | |
dc.authorwosid | EPP-8740-2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001015033900001 | en_US |